'overly aggressive, too persistent'

When I see the words overly aggressive and persistent, I think of terrorists. They stop at nothing. They won't be deterred. They are committed to their cause, the only way to stop them is to kill them.
Susan Crawford, appointed by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates as the convening authority of military commissions, believes that Mohammed al Qahtani, a Saudi national held at Guantanamo Bay, was the victim of 'overly aggressive, too persistent' interogation techniques and therefore he won't be prosecuted.
Keep in mind that Crawford herself believes Qahtani would have been involved in 9/11 but was denied entry to the United States in August '01. Mohammed Atta, remember him? Atta went to Orlando to pick Qahtani up at the airport but some smart immigration inspector said no. He was later captured on the battlefield in Afghanistan.
"There's no doubt in my mind he would've been on one of those planes had he gained access to the country in August 2001," Crawford said of Qahtani. "He's a muscle hijacker. . . . He's a very dangerous man. What do you do with him now if you don't charge him and try him? I would be hesitant to say, 'Let him go.' "Sleep deprivation, isolation, insulting his mother and sister, strip searches, wearing women's undergarments... This is fraternity hazing, not torture. Of course, Qahtani did suffer some medical problems -- he was hospitalized twice with bradycardia, where the heart beats fewer than 60 beats a minute -- but he received top-notch medical care. Anyway, it's Obama's call what happens next.
My question is, why is this guy still alive? We should have killed him and disposed of him long ago.

4 Comments:
Sorry, Kent, I couldn't be everywhere. He was in A-stan, and that's a long way from Kirkuk. Might've gotten his cousin throwing down IEDs though. There's one we won't have to detain here.
Yeah, we definitely need to clone you and post all the different Andrew C's at various hot spots around the world.
I'm curious about your thoughts on this and the entire torture debate. I think you know where I stand.
Apparently, some of the Gitmo detainees might be shipped to nearby Camp Pendleton. Happy day! Thank you President Obama.
Every time I suggest the need for an assassination, my husband gets nervous. Maybe he thinks I am going to grease up the old 30 O 6 and go hunting.
Such a visual, this gramma hunting down some slime and finishing him.
I don't like torture. I also don't like people twisting the definition of torture, which has not changed since the 1920's.
Torture is something that causes permanent physical damage.
Sleep-deprivation is not torture. Loud music is not torture. Insults or threats are not torture. A little slapping around is not torture. Waterboarding is not torture. And naked human pyramids are not torture.#
Submerging a human in battery acid is torture. Hooking a car battery up to genitalia is torture. Brutal beatings, delivered with baseball bats and steel tubing, is torture. Rape is torture.*
Note to any liberals who read these comments: The paragraph ending with an asterisk (*) contains things that Saddam Hussien did. The paragraph preceding that, ending with the number sign (#), are things that the US has done at Gitmo and elsewhere, sometimes as part of official policy, and sometimes not.
Please, please, please, to all liberals reading this, explain how this makes Bush=Saddam. I'm all ears.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home