Thursday, November 5

thud

The phony Barack Obama was always destined to fail. A man of no experience, no resume, no knowledge, no clue, no roadmap...

Obama was/is a nothing. He was always going to be a bad President. Only stupid people believed he was up to the job.

Face it. The Democrats are failures. Everything they believe is incorrect. Higher taxes kill the economy. Naive foreign policy gets Americans killed. Social programs cause bigger social problems. Liberalism is time-honored historical failure.

Liberals, like Obama, only get elected when they pretend to be Conservatives. Remember, Obama promised to cut the taxes of 95% of Americans?

12 Comments:

Blogger Chris said...

It's really gotta suck knowing that you wrote anyone who publicly disagrees with the president is anti-American. It has to suck; your two year old tantrums prove it.

10:51 AM  
Blogger Jaz said...

I love how Chris thinks that he's found his silver bullet argument that in his world absolves him from ever addressing anything ever again on this blog.

Let's call it the 'old post silver bullet argument' or 'old post' for short.

We could ask Chris to explain why it's taking Obama so long to decide what to do about Afghanistan while our troops die and lose morale because there is no clear mission statement and his response would be: old post.

We could ask how could it be that unemployment is above 10% despite the fact that the stimulus package was supposed to add jobs which net, net it hasn't: old post.

What was Obama doing yesterday talking about anything other than the national tragedy at Fort Hood when he first addressed the public choosing instead to do "shout outs" to a medal of freedom winner which he mistakenly refered to as a congressional medal of honor winner? How could he be so tone deaf and insensitive as to not address the shootings right out of the gate? Old post.

Why did Obama give up the Eastern Europe missile shield and get nothing in return except for a hollow promise that Russia would support sanctions on Iran from Medvedev only to be overruled by Putin? Old post.

On and on and on. The fiasco of Obamacare? Old post. The job killing Cap and Tax? Old post.

And on that old post, by the way, I wonder if Chris has ever heard of someone changing his or her mind.

Is it out of the realm of possibility that in the context of supporting the Iraq war it seemed anti-American to not support the President then but now after we have seen what Obama is doing to this country, i.e. taking us in a decidedly European socialist and Un-American direction, that criticism of Obama is not at all anti-American?

I can't really speak for Kent on this, but I'm pretty sure he didn't intend to silence any and all criticism of any future President from now until eternity.

What if Kent thought it was inappropriate to criticize the President at that particular moment in history? Was it not a self-evidently temporary request on Kent's part? After all, I'm quite sure that Kent has criticized President Bush on some issues after writing that post. I know I certainly have. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that because of some old post by Kent that he imagined that my criticism of Bush on the bank bailouts, for example, was somehow out of bounds or Anti-American.

The bottom line here is that Chris' 'old post' silver bullet is a joke. It's merely a tired, broken-record like method he attempts to use in order to abdicate any responsibility for being able to explain in a substantive way all of the various failures, debacles, mistakes, or bad policies of Obama which at this point are legion. In a way you can't blame Chris for being so intellectually lazy as to try to cling to what he regards as a rhetorical panacea. Who could keep up with all the bad news for Obama by having an explanation for each misstep at this point? Things are going so badly, it's virtually impossible.

So every time Chris uses the 'old post' argument we can all now see it for what it is: clear evidence that he has no answers for the tough questions.

At the end of the day, old post is old hat. Unless his goal is to put us to sleep, I would hope that he can come up with some new arguments.

8:25 PM  
Blogger Kent said...

Perfect analysis, Jaz. Chris is a stupid voter. His opinions on politics are genius in his mind alone.

Imagine the absurdity of a blowhard windbag like Chris accusing me of throwing tantrums, when all he does is regurgitate the exact same drivel every time he leaves a comment on this blog?

4:28 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

I love how you two think you can pretend things never happened. I can't judge or foretell what Kent thought when he wrote what he wrote. All I know is that he wrote it. And he said public dissent of the president is anti-American. He should really practice his own preaching.

But now that Bush is gone, publicly dissenting is all Kent does. The wise Jaz, however, absolves Kent and himself from the past simply because Jaz knows Kent didn't mean what he said to be taken so literally.

I can almost agree to that Jaz. Almost, because you and Kent didn't mean for it to be taken so literally. It's obvious you both meant it only for when Bush was in office.

There is no silver bullet Jaz. There's just you and Kent, and you both have become the very things you hate.

10:51 AM  
Blogger Kent said...

There is legitimate criticism and there is illegitimate criticism. You apparently lack the ability and the intelligence to differentiate between the two.

I'm not bashing Obama for sport. I'm questioning his policies. I don't hate the man, it's nothing personal. I disagree and find his policies to be ridiculous and dangerous.

The Left bashed Bush for sport. They hated the man, so they based his policies. It was illegitimate criticism.

Btw, Obama bashed and criticized everything Bush-related on national security and it was illegitimate rhetoric. The proof?

Virtually every Bush-era national security policy remains in place.

You own it, Chris and I own you.

12:26 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Kent, you still don't get it. You still can't comprehend your double standard. And once again you are trying to rewrite history.

No where in your post do you mention illegitimate criticism is anti-American. You don't allude to that at all. You specifically state public dissent is anti-American and only aids our enemies. I know it sucks that someone is holding you to your very own standard but fair is fair.

Also, you tried your Bush-hatred syndrome versus policy disagreement already. It doesn't work. I'm policy guy. I was a policy analyst at a think tank, am a published author on public policy and wrote policy for state and federal government. I'm policy through and through. Unlike you, someone who has never even seen a piece of legislation or read policy, all your disagreements with Obama are indeed for sport. You just don't add up Kent. Own it.

You don't get to rewrite history to now include illegitmate criticism and you don't get to pretend that you are a policy guy. You can't even keep straight if you are a conservative or not, what can you possibly know about policy or reality. The only thing you own is your America hate-fest blog. But own it you will.

7:43 PM  
Blogger Kent said...

What a shock. Chris is repeating himself again, accusing me of hate, rather than commenting on the merits of my post.

My comments to you are for sport because you're an irrational, easy target. It's fun to see you twist yourself into a pretzel.

Comments here about Obama aren't for sport. They are legit disagreements over stupid, failed policies. Policies that you are unable/unwilling to defend.

Obama is taking us back down the road of combating terrorism with a law enforcement approach. That got us 9/11.

Democrats, like you, never learn from the past. They just keep trying the same stuff hoping for a different result. That's the definition of insanity.

You own hope and change and I will always own you.

12:23 PM  
Blogger Jaz said...

Exactly, while we may be attacking Obama's policies Chris is just attacking.

Although I should be careful what I say here because it might be that Chris is finally edging away from his Old Post canard and developing some new talking points.

Although if he does it will likely be a new way of attempting to discredit us or dismiss our individual arguments. He rarely discusses actual policy anymore. But then again who can blame him? I'm not sure where I would begin to defend some of this stuff if someone was paying me to try like they are Chris.

1:57 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

I do indeed bring up the merits of your post. I mention your previous stance that publicly disagreeing with the president is anti-American. Your post is a public disagreement with the president, something you said was anti-American and only aided our enemies. How can you possibly write what you do in this post and stand behind what you wrote when Bush was president?

You have numerous times tried to explain away your contradictions. First calling me an enemy for bringing up your past, and most dominantly by saying disagreements with Bush were illegitimate while your public disagreements with Obama are legit because you are some sort of policy guy. We all know that isn't true. All of us know that. You have never even seen a piece of legislation, much less written one nor analyzed one. Your claim to some sort of policy differences is laughable and delusional at best.

Same for Jaz. Neither of you can stand up to your very belief that publicly disagreeing with Bush was anti-American but doing so with Obama is patriotic. Neither of you can write the sort of stuff you have been writing and not expect your past to be brought up. Keep pretending that you both are policy people and oh so wise. Keep believing it because I'm positive that is the only way you sleep at night.

Once more, I'll directly engage your post by asking how can you possibly write this stuff now when you both believed public disagreements with Bush were anti-American?

I'm sure you won't answer it and accuse me of attacking or pretend that you are policy buffs. No sweat off my back.

7:13 AM  
Blogger Kent said...

You're repeating yourself again, like a senile old woman.

Why are you declining to defend your guy? Obviously you can't.

4:48 PM  
Blogger Jaz said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

12:27 PM  
Blogger Jaz said...

I love how Chris still thinks that he's found his silver bullet argument that in his world absolves him from ever addressing anything ever again on this blog with anything other than Alinksy tactics whereby he tries to scare us by going outside of our experience whenever possible.

Let's call it the 'old post silver bullet argument' or 'old post' for short.

We could ask Chris to explain why it's taking Obama so long to decide what to do about Afghanistan while our troops die and lose morale because there is no clear mission statement and his response would be: old post.

We could ask how could it be that unemployment is above 10% despite the fact that the stimulus package was supposed to add jobs which net, net it hasn't: old post.

What was Obama doing the other day talking about anything other than the national tragedy at Fort Hood when he first addressed the public choosing instead to do "shout outs" to a medal of freedom winner which he mistakenly refered to as a congressional medal of honor winner? How could he be so tone deaf and insensitive as to not address the shootings right out of the gate? Old post.

Why did Obama give up the Eastern Europe missile shield and get nothing in return except for a hollow promise that Russia would support sanctions on Iran from Medvedev only to be overruled by Putin? Old post.

On and on and on. The fiasco of Obamacare? Old post. The job killing Cap and Tax? Old post.

And on that old post, by the way, I wonder if Chris has ever heard of someone changing his or her mind.

Is it out of the realm of possibility that in the context of supporting the Iraq war it seemed anti-American to not support the President then but now after we have seen what Obama is doing to this country, i.e. taking us in a decidedly European socialist and Un-American direction, that criticism of Obama is not at all anti-American?

I can't really speak for Kent on this, but I'm pretty sure he didn't intend to silence any and all criticism of any future President from now until eternity.

What if Kent thought it was inappropriate to criticize the President at that particular moment in history? Was it not a self-evidently temporary request on Kent's part? After all, I'm quite sure that Kent has criticized President Bush on some issues after writing that post. I know I certainly have. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that because of some old post by Kent that he imagined that my criticism of Bush on the bank bailouts, for example, was somehow out of bounds or Anti-American.

The bottom line here is that Chris' 'old post' silver bullet is a joke. It's merely a tired, broken-record like method he attempts to use in order to abdicate any responsibility for being able to explain in a substantive way all of the various failures, debacles, mistakes, or bad policies of Obama which at this point are legion. In a way you can't blame Chris for being so intellectually lazy as to try to cling to what he regards as a rhetorical panacea. Who could keep up with all the bad news for Obama by having an explanation for each misstep at this point? Things are going so badly, it's virtually impossible.

So every time Chris uses the 'old post' argument we can all now see it for what it is: clear evidence that he has no answers for the tough questions.

At the end of the day, old post is old hat. Unless his goal is to put us to sleep, I would hope that he can come up with some new arguments.

And this effort to scare us with his credentials is a bore fest. One's credentials are only as impressive as the conclusions they arrive at. Obama is supposed to have an impressive resume yet he's an unmitigated disaster. I wish he would go back to the ivory tower and leave us lowly regular Americans alone.

12:40 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Copyright 2004-2013, RightFromLeft.blogspot.com. All Rights Reserved. All materials contained on this site are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without prior written permission. 0